Medical Malpractice Illinois, Texas,
Chicago
What Went Wrong? Prooving Medical
Malpractice
Tip - Lawyers
specialize in medical malpractice Illinois, Texas, Chicago, New
York, California, and throughout the USA.
Medical malpractice, though usually defined rather broadly
in the court of public opinion, is often difficult to prove in
a court of law. Extensive criteria must be met for malpractice
to be found by a court of law, and fully two-thirds of all
medical malpractice cases are won by the defendant. Yet, in
order to understand the concept of malpractice and how it
affects the doctor/patient relationship, you first must
understand the popular connotation of the term.
When it comes to public opinion, medical malpractice is any
instance when a doctor has presumably failed in his or her
attempt to provide adequate care for a particular patient, and
the patient has as a result, suffered some sort of harm from
this perceived mistake or oversight. In short, if a patient
observes some type of harm as a result of medical care, a claim
for malpractice might be made. In the legal sense though,
medical malpractice is a much more specific term, issued by the
courts, where three criteria must be met before the term can be
applied.
First, it must be ruled that the doctor has failed in his or
her duty of care towards the patient. A reasonable person would
have done something different in the situation in question,
thereby avoiding the failure. Second, it also must be found
that some harm has resulted from the incident. Simply
determining that the doctor has failed to perform his or her
duty is not sufficient, as the patient must display a
recognizable loss or pain as a result. Now, if a reasonable
person could assume that this harm could have been avoided,
malpractice might exist. Finally, it must also be found that
some damages resulted from the doctor’s mistake or misjudgment.
Mental suffering, loss of wages and physical agony would all be
examples of this.
The difference between the public’s and the courts’ perception
of malpractice boils down to the issue of negligence, and
whether or not the doctor in question is guilty of it.
Negligence requires a state of mind that is found to be
“careless, inattentive, neglectful or otherwise reckless” in
its attitude towards others.
Considering the lack of a cut and dry method for deciding when
and if medical malpractice has occurred, and the potential for
huge financial damages awarded to the victims, doctors
typically carry very large malpractice insurance policies,
which shield them from the financial ruin a large malpractice
suit could potentially bring. With malpractice attorneys
commanding huge fees for their services, the practice of
malpractice law has, not surprisingly, become big business.
Because laws governing medical malpractice, such as the statute
of limitations for filing a suit, vary from state to state, it
is important to get all the facts before proceeding with a
malpractice case.
About the Author:
Medical Malpractice provides detailed information about medical
malpractice attorneys, laws, cases, insurance, statutes of
limitation, and more. For more information go to http://www.e-medicalmalpractice.com
and/or visit our affiliate site at http://www.growthink.com.
|